![]() But I haven’t yet seen evidence of that,” Leick said. “If someone is going to show me that it’s going to make students not do the reading or not learn the material, then I would be concerned. But after experimenting with the tool in her classroom, Leick remained sanguine about the risks for academic misuse. Leick also had her class write a code of conduct for the use of these models - the students agreed that any use should be transparently cited, and that generating the final text for a paper with AI was unethical. “It has been polite, concise, and extremely expressive.” “I used ChatGPT and it is BLOWING MY MIND,” they wrote. One student was enchanted by the conversational tone of the model. But some found that it suggested useful terms or topics that they could use for follow-up research. ![]() Others reported that it made false claims. Some found that it provided clear, factual information, but with a lack of depth and insight. Leick had her students ask the model the same questions they were asking in their research proposals and reflect on the results. ![]() ![]() “The more interesting question is: ‘Since students have this new technology available to them, what are some ways we could use it that might actually be productive?’” ![]() “‘Will students cheat?’ is not that interesting of a question to me,” Leick said. Karen Leick, senior lecturer and director of the professional writing program in the English department. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |